From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pleto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 16, 1983
98 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

December 16, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Except in the most compelling circumstances, which are not present in this case, the parties to a matrimonial action should not waste their assets and court's time seeking review of an order of temporary alimony (see Sterlace v. Sterlace, 63 A.D.2d 450, 453). A prompt trial is the most effective means to resolve any claimed inequities in temporary alimony awards (see Chernofsky v Chernofsky, 90 A.D.2d 765; Hahn v. Hahn, 65 A.D.2d 782; Steinfink v. Steinfink, 65 A.D.2d 621).


Summaries of

Pleto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 16, 1983
98 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Pleto

Case Details

Full title:FRANK P. PLETO, JR., Appellant, LINDA M. PLETO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1983

Citations

98 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)