From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plechavicius v. Mendoza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1987
128 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 23, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burchell, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is denied.

Taking all the allegations pleaded as true, the plaintiffs' complaint makes out causes of action sounding in intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, and conversion. Therefore, the motion to dismiss the complaint as failing to state a cause of action should not have been granted (see, Sanders v. Winship, 57 N.Y.2d 391, 394; Guggenheimer v. Ginzburg, 43 N.Y.2d 268, 275). We have considered the plaintiffs' other contention and find it to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Plechavicius v. Mendoza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1987
128 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Plechavicius v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PLECHAVICIUS et al., Appellants, v. CONCHITA MENDOZA, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing at Birchwood, LLC v. S & L Birchwood, LLC

“On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court must determine, accepting as true the factual…