From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pleasant v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 14, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV269-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV269-HEH

07-14-2020

JEFFREY A. PLEASANT, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

Jeffrey A. Pleasant, a federal inmate, "has filed numerous frivolous attempts to challenge his state and federal convictions." Pleasant v. Clarke, No. 3:15CV218, 2015 WL 11110959, at *1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2015), aff'd, 620 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2015). "Because of Pleasant's history of abusive filings challenging his federal conviction and state charges, the Court [found] that Pleasant ha[d] abused the writ of habeas corpus." Id. at *2. Therefore, the Court informed Pleasant that:

[B]efore the Court will review any new action challenging his federal conviction or state charges in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, no matter what Pleasant labels the action, Pleasant must do the following:
Attach to the front of any filing, a document labeled "Certificate of Compliance" that contains:
a. A brief summary, not to exceed one (1) page, explaining why the Court has jurisdiction to consider his current submission;
b. A certification that he challenges a judgment of conviction that results in a present restraint on his liberty; and
c. A certification that the claims he presents are new claims never before raised and set forth why each claim could not have been raised in his previous action.
Id. Pleasant was expressly warned that the "failure to comply with the above directives w[ould] result in summary dismissal of the new action." Id.

On April 14, 2020, the Court received from Pleasant a document titled, "FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 60(b) MOTION TO VACATE VOID JUDGMENT." (ECF No. 1, at 1.) In that submission, Pleasant once again attempts to challenge either his state or federal convictions. Pleasant, however, failed to attach the required "Certificate of Compliance." Accordingly, the present action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court will deny a certificate of appealability.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

Henry E. Hudson

Senior United States District Judge Date: July 14, 2020
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Pleasant v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 14, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV269-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Pleasant v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY A. PLEASANT, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV269-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 14, 2020)