From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pleasant v. Tihonovich

Supreme Court of Colorado
Jun 28, 1982
647 P.2d 236 (Colo. 1982)

Summary

holding prisoner serving Colorado sentence was entitled to credit for time he was in New Mexico pursuant to interstate Agreement on Detainers

Summary of this case from State v. Leahy

Opinion

No. 82SA233

Decided June 28, 1982.

Original Proceeding

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Daniel W. Edwards, Deputy State Public Defender, for petitioner.

G. F. Sandstrom, Jr., District Attorney, Matthew Martin, Deputy District Attorney, for respondent.

En Banc.


The petitioner filed this original proceeding seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus under C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be ordered to grant petitioner credit on his Colorado sentence with the time he was in New Mexico pursuant to the Agreement on Detainers, section 24-60-502, et seq., C.R.S. 1973.

The District Attorney for Pueblo County has entered his appearance on behalf of the respondent and agrees with the petitioner that the time spent in New Mexico pursuant to the Agreement on Detainers should be counted against petitioner's original sentence to the Pueblo County Jail.

The rule is made absolute.

JUSTICE DUBOFSKY does not participate.


Summaries of

Pleasant v. Tihonovich

Supreme Court of Colorado
Jun 28, 1982
647 P.2d 236 (Colo. 1982)

holding prisoner serving Colorado sentence was entitled to credit for time he was in New Mexico pursuant to interstate Agreement on Detainers

Summary of this case from State v. Leahy
Case details for

Pleasant v. Tihonovich

Case Details

Full title:Martin A. Pleasant, Petitioner, v. Dan Tihonovich, Sheriff of the County…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado

Date published: Jun 28, 1982

Citations

647 P.2d 236 (Colo. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Leahy

See Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 24-60-501 (West 2015). See, also, Pleasant v. Tihonovich, 647 P.2d 236 (Colo.…