From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Playland Holding Corp. v. Nunley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 26, 1946
186 Misc. 864 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

March 26, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, CRAWFORD, J.

Milton Harawitz for appellant.

Charles H. Ellner and David Koss for respondents.


MEMORANDUM


An amusement park does not come within the category of any of the enumerated places of public assembly which are expressly excepted from the operation of chapter 314 of the Laws of 1945 (Business Rent Law). Consequently, the penny arcade space occupied by the tenants herein is subject to the provisions of the statute. Upon the trial, however, the uncontradicted evidence established that the landlord sought in good faith to recover possession of the demised premises for its own immediate use.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to the landlord, and final order directed for the landlord, with appropriate costs in the court below.

MacCRATE, SMITH and STEINBRINK, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Playland Holding Corp. v. Nunley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 26, 1946
186 Misc. 864 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Playland Holding Corp. v. Nunley

Case Details

Full title:PLAYLAND HOLDING CORPORATION, Landlord, Appellant, v. WILLIAM NUNLEY et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1946

Citations

186 Misc. 864 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
65 N.Y.S.2d 465