From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PLATYPUS WEAR v. HORIZONTE FABRICACAO DISTRIBUICAO

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division
Feb 16, 2010
CASE NO. 08-20738-CIV-JORDAN (S.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 08-20738-CIV-JORDAN.

February 16, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT RECOMMENDATION


Upon de novo review of the record, I adopt Judge McAliley's report [D.E. 434] recommending that the plaintiffs' motion for sanctions against Horizonte for corrupting payments to third-party fact witnesses be denied. The plaintiffs' motion for sanctions [D.E. 153] is therefore DENIED.

At trial, however, I will have the opportunity to ascertain whether Mr. Baagoe, Mr. Theodosakis, and Mr. Aguirre are improperly biased in Horizonte's favor, or whether they may have altered their testimony to favor Horizonte. If I find that to be the case, I will revisit the issue of sanctions.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida.


Summaries of

PLATYPUS WEAR v. HORIZONTE FABRICACAO DISTRIBUICAO

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division
Feb 16, 2010
CASE NO. 08-20738-CIV-JORDAN (S.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2010)
Case details for

PLATYPUS WEAR v. HORIZONTE FABRICACAO DISTRIBUICAO

Case Details

Full title:PLATYPUS WEAR, INC., et al. Plaintiff v. HORIZONTE FABRICACAO DISTRIBUICAO…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division

Date published: Feb 16, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 08-20738-CIV-JORDAN (S.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2010)

Citing Cases

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

See Armenian Assembly of Am., Inc. v. Cafesjian, 924 F. Supp. 2d 183, 194 (D.D.C. 2013) aff'd, 758 F.3d 265…

Covey v. Colonial Pipeline Co.

Relevant here, courts have found under similar rules that payments to fact witnesses for the content of their…