From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Platt v. Hook

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1851
5 Del. 352 (Del. Super. Ct. 1851)

Opinion

Fall Sessions, 1851.

CERTIORARI.


The defendant filed exceptions, without any signature. Mr. Gordon moved to affirm the judgment, on the ground that no exceptions were filed. The statement on the face of the exceptions that the defendant appears and files exceptions is nothing, without a signature, as it is not the act of any one, either to bind him, or to require that it should be noticed by the other party, without signature.

The motion was resisted by Mr. Johnson, (who however, did not file the exceptions,) but the court affirmed the judgment, on the ground taken.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Platt v. Hook

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1851
5 Del. 352 (Del. Super. Ct. 1851)
Case details for

Platt v. Hook

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL PLATT vs. WALDREN C. HOOK

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1851

Citations

5 Del. 352 (Del. Super. Ct. 1851)