Opinion
2:20-cv-00062-JHC
02-06-2023
THERESE ROHLING PLATT, Plaintiff, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., a Washington corporation; HOLLAND AMERICA LINE - U.S.A., a Delaware corporation; HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, N.V. LLC., a Curacao corporation; and HAL ANTILLEN N.V., a Curacao corporation, Defendants.
ORDER
John H. Chun United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff's Rule 6(1)(B) Motion to Extend Time to Respond to D[e]fendants' Motion to Strike Dr. Wood.” Dkt. # 61. Presumably, Plaintiff intends to bring the motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1). As the motion was brought after the deadline at issue passed, the excusable neglect standard applies. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(B). Yet Plaintiff does not explain how she meets that standard.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion.