From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Platt v. Cooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0080-CG-MU (S.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0080-CG-MU

09-26-2019

EARNEST FRANKLIN PLATT, AIS 128625 Petitioner, v. MARY COOKS, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that the Petition is hereby DISMISSED/DENIED because it does not state a claim for federal habeas corpus relief or, otherwise, because the Court is procedurally barred from reach the merits of any constitutional claim Petitioner arguable has asserted in this petition.

The Court finds that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2019.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Platt v. Cooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0080-CG-MU (S.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Platt v. Cooks

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST FRANKLIN PLATT, AIS 128625 Petitioner, v. MARY COOKS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0080-CG-MU (S.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2019)

Citing Cases

Herrine v. Folks

Herrine's petition provides essentially no factual context or procedural history for his parole-related…