Opinion
No. 63918
10-02-2014
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of negligent entrustment in a tort case.
After the district court denied their motion, petitioners Drew Plat, Johnny Autoworld, Inc., and JS Autoworld, Inc. filed the present petition for a writ of mandamus from this court ordering the district court to grant their motion for partial summary judgment. A writ of mandamus is not available "when an adequate and speedy legal remedy exists." Rolf Jensen & Assocs., Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 128 Nev. ___, ___, 282 P.3d 743, 745 (2012) (internal quotations omitted); see NRS 34.170. The right to appeal, "after a final judgment is ultimately entered, will generally constitute an adequate and speedy legal remedy precluding writ relief." D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474, 168 P.3d 731, 736 (2007). Because petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary writ relief is warranted, Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004), and they have not demonstrated why an eventual appeal will not provide them with an adequate legal remedy, we
The Honorable Ron Parraguirre, Justice, voluntarily recused himself from participation in the decision of this matter.
/s/_________, C.J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
/s/_________, J.
Hardesty
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge
Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP
Edward M. Bernstein & Associates/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk