Opinion
SC: 150542 SC: 150543
05-28-2015
JAMES E. PLASTOW, JR. and ISABELL JUNE PLASTOW, Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants-Appellees, v. DONALD G. HIGMAN et al., Defendants-Appellees, and KATHLEEN E. HIGMAN et al., Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs-Appellees, and LARRY J. NOBACH and SANDRA K. NOBACH, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs-Appellants, and MARJORIE A. BERNDT et al., Defendants, and THEODORE L. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee. JAMES E. PLASTOW, JR. and ISABELL JUNE PLASTOW, Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants-Appellees, v. DONALD G. HIGMAN et al., Defendants-Appellees, and KATHLEEN E. HIGMAN et al., Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs-Appellees, and LARRY J. NOBACH and SANDRA K. NOBACH, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs-Appellants, and MARJORIE A. BERNDT et al., Defendants.
Order
Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, Justices COA: 313653
Antrim CC: 2008-008408-CH
COA: 313740
Antrim CC: 2008-008408-CH
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 28, 2015
/s/_________
Clerk