Opinion
No. 79743-COA
10-08-2019
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a post-judgment district court order awarding judgment on an attorney fees lien.
Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted because the order is appealable, precluding writ relief. See NRS 34.170; NRAP 3A(b)(8); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (stating that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED. /s/_________, C.J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Bulla cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge
In light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.
The Honorable Jerome T. Tao, Judge, did not participate in the decision in this matter.
Hatfield & Associates, Ltd.
The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.C
Eighth District Court Clerk