From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plascencia v. Barnhart

United States District Court, S.D. California
Sep 25, 2005
Case No. 05cv0450 WQH (RBB) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 05cv0450 WQH (RBB).

September 25, 2005

CAROL C. LAM, United States Attorney. THOMAS C. STAHL Assistant U.S. Attorney Chief, Civil Division, San Diego, California, Attorneys for Defendant.

MARY N. MITCHELL, Attorney for Plaintiff.


STIPULATION FOR REMAND AND ORDER THEREON


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. The Commissioner has agreed to a voluntary remand of the above-mentioned case for further administrative action pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand the administrative law judge (ALJ) will hold a new hearing and obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony to determine whether there are a significant number of jobs that Plaintiff can perform. The ALJ will ask the vocational expert to provide specific numbers of each job that is identified.

2. A separate judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 shall be entered by the Clerk of the Court.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. A separate judgment shall be entered by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58.


Summaries of

Plascencia v. Barnhart

United States District Court, S.D. California
Sep 25, 2005
Case No. 05cv0450 WQH (RBB) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Plascencia v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD PLASCENCIA, Plaintiff, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Sep 25, 2005

Citations

Case No. 05cv0450 WQH (RBB) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2005)