From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 09-01714 BZ

10-31-2011

PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC., Defendants.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Gabriel S. Gross Attorneys for Defendants ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC. CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS David Bohrer Attorneys for Plaintiff PLANTRONICS, INC.


QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART

& SULLIVAN, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and

Aliphcom, Inc.

CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS

David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)

CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics. Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

CIV. L.R. 6-2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Aliph, Inc. and AliphCom, Inc. and Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order.

WHEREAS, the Court has set the date for a "Settlement Conference" to be "[n]ot later than 60 days after service by the Court of its Claim Construction Ruling," which issued on October 6, 2011 (Orders, D.N. 91, 142);

WHEREAS, the Court has referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte for Settlement Conference (Order, D.N. 146);

WHEREAS, the parties have been working cooperatively to find a date that would accommodate the schedules of Magistrate Judge Laporte, of the decision-makers with settlement authority for Plantronics, and of the decision-makers with settlement authority for Aliph;

WHEREAS, the parties have found a date on or around December 15,2011 that appears to accommodate the schedules of both parties and Magistrate Judge Laporte;

ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree that the time for holding a settlement conference should be extended beyond December 6, 2011 to January 6, 2011:

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,

LLP

Gabriel S. Gross

Attorneys for Defendants

ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.

CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS

David Bohrer

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PLANTRONICS, INC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

I, Dane W. Reinstedt, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David Bohrer, counsel for Plaintiff and Gabriel Gross, counsel for Defendant, have concurred in this filing.

Dane W. Reinstedt


Summaries of

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)