Opinion
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
11-30-2011
PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC., Defendants.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602) Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672) Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and Aliphcom, Inc. CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258) Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279) Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)
Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672)
Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and
Aliphcom, Inc.
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258)
Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279)
Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT
DISCOVERY
CIV. L.R. 6-2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Aliph, Inc. and AliphCom, Inc. and Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order.
WHEREAS, the Court has set the date for the "Fact Discovery Cut-off" to be November 23, 2011 (Order, D.N. 91);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3, motions to compel fact discovery may not be filed more than 7 days after the Fact Discovery Cut-off, except by order of the Court for good cause shown;
WHEREAS, in this case, the 7 days between the Fact Discovery Cut-off and the deadline for filing motions to compel included the Thanksgiving holiday;
WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaged in meeting and conferring to resolve outstanding discovery issues, and believe that additional time before the deadline for motions to compel will enable them to narrow, if not resolve any such issues;
ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree that the deadline for filing a motion to compel should be extended one week to December 7, 2011, and that compliance with the deadline will be met by filing a letter requesting a conference with the Court regarding a fact discovery dispute, pursuant the Court's Initial Discovery Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
By: Gabriel S. Gross
Attorneys for Defendants
ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
By: David Bohrer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PLANTRONICS, INC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Hon. Bernard Zimmerman
United States Magistrate Judge
I, Dane Reinstedt, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David Bohrer, counsel for Plaintiff and Gabriel Gross, counsel for Defendant, have concurred in this filing.
Dane Reinstedt