From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 30, 2011
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 09-01714 BZ

11-30-2011

PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC., Defendants.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602) Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672) Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and Aliphcom, Inc. CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258) Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279) Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.


QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART

& SULLIVAN, LLP

Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)

Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672)

Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and

Aliphcom, Inc.

CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS

David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)

CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258)

Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279)

Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR

MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT

DISCOVERY

CIV. L.R. 6-2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Aliph, Inc. and AliphCom, Inc. and Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order.

WHEREAS, the Court has set the date for the "Fact Discovery Cut-off" to be November 23, 2011 (Order, D.N. 91);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3, motions to compel fact discovery may not be filed more than 7 days after the Fact Discovery Cut-off, except by order of the Court for good cause shown;

WHEREAS, in this case, the 7 days between the Fact Discovery Cut-off and the deadline for filing motions to compel included the Thanksgiving holiday;

WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaged in meeting and conferring to resolve outstanding discovery issues, and believe that additional time before the deadline for motions to compel will enable them to narrow, if not resolve any such issues;

ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree that the deadline for filing a motion to compel should be extended one week to December 7, 2011, and that compliance with the deadline will be met by filing a letter requesting a conference with the Court regarding a fact discovery dispute, pursuant the Court's Initial Discovery Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,

LLP

By: Gabriel S. Gross

Attorneys for Defendants

ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.

CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS

By: David Bohrer

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PLANTRONICS, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

I, Dane Reinstedt, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David Bohrer, counsel for Plaintiff and Gabriel Gross, counsel for Defendant, have concurred in this filing.

Dane Reinstedt


Summaries of

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 30, 2011
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)