From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plant v. Plant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Summary

In James v. Plant, 4 Ad. El. 749, the court refused to hold that there was an extinguishment of an admitted previously existing easement where a person held an estate in fee and another for a term of years.

Summary of this case from Matteodo v. Ricci

Opinion

November 10, 1987

Appeal from the Monroe County Family Court, Affronti, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Family Ct Act § 1112). Were we to reach the merits we would affirm.


Summaries of

Plant v. Plant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

In James v. Plant, 4 Ad. El. 749, the court refused to hold that there was an extinguishment of an admitted previously existing easement where a person held an estate in fee and another for a term of years.

Summary of this case from Matteodo v. Ricci
Case details for

Plant v. Plant

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN J. PLANT, Respondent, v. JAMES P. PLANT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Tuttle v. Kilroa

There was also evidence justifying the presiding judge in finding that the right thus acquired by Stearns…

Matteodo v. Ricci

The English cases cited by them are also of no assistance, as the problem before the court in each of them…