From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PLANKINTON v. NYE COUNTY

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 31, 1979
588 P.2d 1025 (Nev. 1979)

Summary

holding that alleged error could not be demonstrated on appeal absent citation to relevant authority

Summary of this case from Butler Crockett v. Pinecrest Pipeline

Opinion

No. 9712

January 12, 1979 Rehearing denied January 31, 1979

Appeal from Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Joseph O. McDaniel, Judge.

Jeffrey Ian Shaner, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Richard H. Bryan, Attorney General, Carson City; Peter L. Knight, District Attorney, and A.D. Demetras, Deputy District Attorney, Nye County, for Respondents.


OPINION


Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that he was precluded from raising the issue of irregularities in the creation of the unincorporated town of Pahrump in this action in order to enjoin the enforcement of a township ordinance. Appellant has cited no relevant authority in support of his contention. Since error has not been affirmatively demonstrated, the judgment is affirmed. Holland Livestock v. B C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).


Summaries of

PLANKINTON v. NYE COUNTY

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 31, 1979
588 P.2d 1025 (Nev. 1979)

holding that alleged error could not be demonstrated on appeal absent citation to relevant authority

Summary of this case from Butler Crockett v. Pinecrest Pipeline
Case details for

PLANKINTON v. NYE COUNTY

Case Details

Full title:WALTER R. PLANKINTON, APPELLANT, v. NYE COUNTY, NEVADA, AN UNINCORPORATED…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jan 31, 1979

Citations

588 P.2d 1025 (Nev. 1979)
588 P.2d 1025

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

Without citing any authority, appellant argues that the District Attorney breached the agreement when he…

Squires v. Sierra Nev. Educational Found

However, the appellant must have presented some relevant legal authority in support of his contention.…