From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaisted v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 18, 2011
3:11-cv-00442-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00442-HDM-WGC.

October 18, 2011


ORDER


On August 26, 2011, defendant Shinseki filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the United States is the only proper party in a Federal Tort Claims Act action, which plaintiff had alleged in the original complaint. (Docket No. 6) On September 9, 2011, this court granted the parties' stipulation to extend the time in which to file a response to the motion to dismiss, extending the time to respond to September 26, 2011. (Docket No. 9) On September 26, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation for plaintiff to file an amended complaint for the purpose of adding the United States as a defendant, which this court granted on September 27, 2011. (Docket Nos. 10, 11) On October 17, 2011, the plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand adding the United States as a defendant. (Docket No. 12) Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 6) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plaisted v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 18, 2011
3:11-cv-00442-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Plaisted v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PLAISTED, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ERIC SHINSEKI, in…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-00442-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2011)