From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 2016
150 A.3d 1150 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

10-04-2016

STATE of Connecticut v. Brian W. JORDAN

Kevin M. Smith and Daniel M. Erwin, in support of the petition.


Kevin M. Smith and Daniel M. Erwin, in support of the petition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 35, 140 A.3d 421 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the preclusion of the initial aggressor evidence was harmless error?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the victim's subsequent domestic violence convictions as evidence that he was the initial aggressor during the defendant's barroom assault?"


Summaries of

State v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 2016
150 A.3d 1150 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Brian W. JORDAN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 4, 2016

Citations

150 A.3d 1150 (Conn. 2016)
323 Conn. 920