Summary
analogizing municipal-utility and private-utility ratemaking
Summary of this case from Meglino v. Township Committee of EagleswoodOpinion
Argued February 5, 1948 —
Decided May 13, 1948.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 135 N.J.L. 22.
For the appellant, Stanger Howell ( Robert G. Howell, of counsel).
For the respondents, John A. Casarow ( David L. Hurovitz, of counsel).
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, DONGES, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, McLEAN, JJ. 6.
For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, BURLING, FREUND, SCHETTINO, JJ. 5.