Pizzuto v. Arave

Full title: Pizzuto v. Arave

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 3, 2003

97-99017o (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 2003)

Opinion

Pizzuto v. Arave97-99017o

GERALD ROSS PIZZUTO, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

A. J. ARAVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 97-99017

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

October 3, 2003

D.C. No. CV-92-00241-S-AAM

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pizzuto seeks clarification of the time for filing a petition for rehearing in light of the fact that this court has rendered its decision in Summerlin v. Stewart, 341 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc). The time for filing a petition for rehearing and/or petition for rehearing en banc is stayed until final dis- position of Summerlin by the United States Supreme Court. Pizzuto shall have 30 days from that date in which to seek rehearing in this court. Meanwhile, the opinion filed February 6, 2002 in this case may not be cited for precedential effect.