From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pizzuto v. Arave

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 3, 2003
345 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

No. 97-99017.

October 3, 2003.

D.C. No. CV-92-00241-S-AAM.

Joan M. Fisher, Esq., Bruce D. Livingston, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Moscow, ID, Robert H. Gombiner, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Michael A. Henderson, AAG, Michaelina Murphy, dag, Boise, ID, Kenneth Robins, L. LaMont Anderson, Esq., for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: B. FLETCHER, RYMER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Pizzuto seeks clarification of the time for filing a petition for rehearing in light of the fact that this court has rendered its decision in Summerlin v. Stewart, 341 F.3d 1082(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The time for filing a petition for rehearing and/or petition for rehearing en banc is stayed until final disposition of Summerlin by the United States Supreme Court. Pizzuto shall have 30 days from that date in which to seek rehearing in this court. Meanwhile, the opinion filed February 6, 2002 in this case may not be cited for precedential effect.


Summaries of

Pizzuto v. Arave

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 3, 2003
345 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Pizzuto v. Arave

Case Details

Full title:Gerald Ross PIZZUTO, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.J. ARAVE, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 3, 2003

Citations

345 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

Pizzuto v. Arave

Once Ring was decided, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), we further…