From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pizzonia v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 1, 2012
12-CV-2450 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2012)

Opinion

12-CV-2450 (JBW)

10-01-2012

DOMINICK PIZZONIA Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.


ORDER

JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:

Petitioner seeks to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel.

For the reasons stated orally on the record, the case is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. The petition is time-barred. Petitioner makes no showing that would warrant equitable tolling for the period that would need to be tolled for the petition to be deemed timely. Even if the petition were not time-barred, the ineffective assistance of counsel claims are frivolous and lack constitutional basis.

A certificate of appealability is denied since no non-frivolous constitutional issue is raised.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

Jack B. Weinstein

Senior District Judge, Eastern District of New York
Dated: October 1, 2012

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Pizzonia v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 1, 2012
12-CV-2450 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Pizzonia v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DOMINICK PIZZONIA Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 1, 2012

Citations

12-CV-2450 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2012)