From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pizarro v. Galaza

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 6, 2006
CV F 98 5207 REC WMW P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2006)

Opinion

CV F 98 5207 REC WMW P.

February 6, 2006


ORDER RE: FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS (#20), DISMISSING ACTION, AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 2, 2005, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 2, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk is directed to close enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pizarro v. Galaza

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 6, 2006
CV F 98 5207 REC WMW P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Pizarro v. Galaza

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PIZARRO, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE GALAZA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 6, 2006

Citations

CV F 98 5207 REC WMW P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2006)