From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitts v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
May 24, 2017
No. 3D16-327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 24, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D16-327

05-24-2017

Charles Pitts, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Charles Pitts, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Lower Tribunal No. 95-18357-B An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge. Charles Pitts, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before LAGOA, SCALES, and LUCK, JJ. LAGOA, J.

Affirmed. See Horn v. State, 775 So. 2d 1007, 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (finding that incorrect calculation in sentencing guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant as defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender); McGee v. State, 19 So. 3d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (finding that "any error in a guidelines scoresheet is harmless when the defendant is sentenced as a habitual offender").


Summaries of

Pitts v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
May 24, 2017
No. 3D16-327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Pitts v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles Pitts, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: May 24, 2017

Citations

No. 3D16-327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 24, 2017)