From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitts v. Kerstein

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 13, 2024
2:24-CV-00021-BSM-PSH (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-CV-00021-BSM-PSH

03-13-2024

KENNETH RAY PITTS ADC #085938 PLAINTIFF v. GARY KERSTEIN, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Having reviewed the record de novo, Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 5] is adopted and Kenneth Pitts's claims against Emma Hatchett, Rory Griffin, and Aundrea Culclager are dismissed without prejudice. Pitts's motion for Rule 11 sanctions [Doc. No. 14] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Pitts v. Kerstein

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 13, 2024
2:24-CV-00021-BSM-PSH (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Pitts v. Kerstein

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH RAY PITTS ADC #085938 PLAINTIFF v. GARY KERSTEIN, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

2:24-CV-00021-BSM-PSH (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)