Opinion
No. 12-1134
04-30-2012
MICHAEL EUGENE PITTS; ARTHUR EUGENE PITTS, JR., a/k/a Sean Michael Pitts; DEBRA LYNN PITTS-RYLES; STEPHANIE PITTS-EVANS Plaintiffs - Appellants v. RICHARD GLASSER, Esq. et al; BETH VAUGHN, Esq.; HORTENSIA PITTS; RANDOLPH CARLSON, II, Esq. Defendants - Appellees.
Michael Eugene Pitts; Arthur Eugene Pitts, Jr.; Debra Lynn Pitts-Ryles; Stephanie Pitts-Evans, Appellants Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia; Jerome David Crain, Jr., WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia; Farnaz Farkish, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00337-MSD-DEM)
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Eugene Pitts; Arthur Eugene Pitts, Jr.; Debra Lynn Pitts-Ryles; Stephanie Pitts-Evans, Appellants Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia; Jerome David Crain, Jr., WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia; Farnaz Farkish, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Eugene Pitts, Arthur Eugene Pitts, Jr., Debra Lynn Pitts-Ryles, and Stephanie Pitts-Evans appeal the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pitts v. Glasser, No. 2:11-cv-00337-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED