From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitts Properties, Inc. v. Auburn Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 21, 2005
618 S.E.2d 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

In Pitts Properties v. Auburn Bank, 274 Ga. App. 538 (618 SE2d 171) (2005), the trial court expressly warned appellants, "This is a frivolous action.

Summary of this case from Transp. Ins. v. Piedmont Const

Opinion

A05A0918.

Decided July 21, 2005.

Frivolous appeal. Troup Superior Court. Before Judge Baldwin.

George R. Belche, Franklin H. Thornton, for appellants.

Grogan, Rumer Gunby, Stephen G. Gunby, for appellees.


In this case, the following circumstances exist and are dispositive of the appeal:

(1) The evidence supports the judgment;

(2) No reversible error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value; and

(3) The issues are controlled adversely to the appellants for the reasons and authority given in the appellees' brief.

The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36. Moreover, the trial court noted at the hearing on the motion to dismiss, "if they bring another action about this, I would put them on notice about attorney's fees, if they continue to do it. This is a frivolous action. [You] should not be in court. If there's any way to make them pay attorney's fees, I will do so." Appellants ignored the trial court's fully justified warning and prosecuted this wholly frivolous appeal. We therefore assess frivolous appeal penalties pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 15 (b), in the amount of $1,000 against appellants and $1,000 against their appellate counsel. Upon return of the remittitur, the trial court is directed to enter a $2,000 judgment in favor of Auburn Bank and J.G. Stewart in the form of a $1,000 penalty against Pitts Properties, Inc. and David Pitts, and a $1,000 penalty against their appellate counsel.

Judgment affirmed. Ellington and Adams, JJ., concur.


DECIDED JULY 21, 2005.


Summaries of

Pitts Properties, Inc. v. Auburn Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 21, 2005
618 S.E.2d 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)

In Pitts Properties v. Auburn Bank, 274 Ga. App. 538 (618 SE2d 171) (2005), the trial court expressly warned appellants, "This is a frivolous action.

Summary of this case from Transp. Ins. v. Piedmont Const
Case details for

Pitts Properties, Inc. v. Auburn Bank

Case Details

Full title:PITTS PROPERTIES, INC. et al. v. AUBURN BANK et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 21, 2005

Citations

618 S.E.2d 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)
618 S.E.2d 171

Citing Cases

Transp. Ins. v. Piedmont Const

In addition, ignoring a trial court's warnings regarding the lack of merit of a claim supports an assessment…

Jones v. Forest Lake Village Home. Assn.

Upon return of the remittitur, the trial court is directed to enter a $5,000 judgment in favor of appellants…