From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittman v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 22, 2019
268 So. 3d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D17-3574

04-22-2019

Christopher PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael Ufferman, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Michael Ufferman, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Christopher Pittman appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine (400 grams or more) and trafficking in methamphetamine (200 grams or more) arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Each of his two motions sought a mistrial for improper testimony. We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the respective motions as neither instance of allegedly improper testimony vitiated the entire trial. See England v. State , 940 So.2d 389 (Fla. 2006).

Accordingly, the convictions are AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pittman v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 22, 2019
268 So. 3d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Pittman v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 22, 2019

Citations

268 So. 3d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)