From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittman v. Piedmont Reg'l Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Dec 11, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV684 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV684

12-11-2017

DAMIAN PITTMAN, Petitioner, v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, a former inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By Memorandum Order entered on October 30, 2017, the Court directed Petitioner to complete and return the standardized form for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. More than eleven (11) days have expired since the entry of the October 30, 2017 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has failed to return the standardized form. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 12/11/17
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Pittman v. Piedmont Reg'l Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Dec 11, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV684 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Pittman v. Piedmont Reg'l Jail

Case Details

Full title:DAMIAN PITTMAN, Petitioner, v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Dec 11, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV684 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2017)