From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittman v. Inter Nat Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Mar 13, 2008
No. 13-07-00480-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-07-00480-CV

Opinion delivered and filed March 13, 2008.

On Appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, Hilton Pittman, and appellee, Inter National Bank, have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. According to the motion, the parties have reached a settlement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal, and accordingly, desire to dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to agreement between the parties, costs will be borne by the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Pittman v. Inter Nat Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Mar 13, 2008
No. 13-07-00480-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Pittman v. Inter Nat Bank

Case Details

Full title:HILTON PITTMAN, APPELLANT, v. INTER NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Mar 13, 2008

Citations

No. 13-07-00480-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 13, 2008)