From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitt v. FCI Berlin

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 17, 2022
22-cv-156-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 17, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-156-SM

11-17-2022

Luis Pitt v. FCI Berlin, Warden


ORDER

STEVEN J. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October 27, 2022, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close the case.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Pitt v. FCI Berlin

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 17, 2022
22-cv-156-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Pitt v. FCI Berlin

Case Details

Full title:Luis Pitt v. FCI Berlin, Warden

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

22-cv-156-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 17, 2022)