From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 7, 2021
No. 21-1797 (8th Cir. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

21-1797

09-07-2021

David Pitlor Plaintiff-Appellant v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.; Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.; Kutak Rock LLP Defendants-Appellees


Unpublished

Submitted: September 1, 2021

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Pitlor appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se complaint. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Plymouth Cnty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.


Summaries of

Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 7, 2021
No. 21-1797 (8th Cir. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Pitlor v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:David Pitlor Plaintiff-Appellant v. T.D. Ameritrade, Inc.; Charles Schwab…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1797 (8th Cir. Sep. 7, 2021)

Citing Cases

Hill v. U.S. Bank Home Mortg.

A claim under this statute requires class-based invidious discrimination, which she has not alleged any facts…

Hill v. U.S. Bank Home Mortg.

A claim under this statute requires class-based invidious discrimination, meaning there must be some “racial,…