From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitchford v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 5, 2012
NUMBER 13-11 -00630-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11 -00630-CR

01-05-2012

WILLIAM BRANDON PITCHFORD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 252nd District Court

of Jefferson County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Counsel for appellant filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. In a signed attachment, appellant states that he no longer wishes to pursue his appeal. We find the motion and attachment together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and his attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Pitchford v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 5, 2012
NUMBER 13-11 -00630-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Pitchford v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRANDON PITCHFORD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

NUMBER 13-11 -00630-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2012)