From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitcher v. Barnhart

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 30, 2009
5:06-CV-1395 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)

Summary

finding that, even where the treating physician was unresponsive to earlier requests, the existence of the same physician's treatment notes in the record suggested that the ALJ's failure to obtain relevant records could not be explained by ALJ's knowledge that the physician would not provide the necessary findings

Summary of this case from Fusilier v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

5:06-CV-1395 (LEK/VEB).

March 30, 2009


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on March 5, 2009 by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(d) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 13). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Randy J. Pitcher, which were filed on March 19, 2009. Objections (Dkt. No. 14).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Cross Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for reconsideration; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pitcher v. Barnhart

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 30, 2009
5:06-CV-1395 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)

finding that, even where the treating physician was unresponsive to earlier requests, the existence of the same physician's treatment notes in the record suggested that the ALJ's failure to obtain relevant records could not be explained by ALJ's knowledge that the physician would not provide the necessary findings

Summary of this case from Fusilier v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

finding that, even where treating physician was unresponsive to two earlier requests, the existence of same physician's treatment notes in the record suggested that ALJ's failure to obtain relevant records could not be explained by ALJ's knowledge that physician would not provide the necessary findings

Summary of this case from Hilsdorf v. Commissioner of Social Security

remanding because although the disability worksheet states that the treating source did not respond to multiple requests, “there are treatment notes in the record from [the treating source], indicating that at some point he did in fact submit records,” therefore the court could not establish that the hearing officer knew from past experience that the source would not provide the requested findings

Summary of this case from Butler v. Astrue
Case details for

Pitcher v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:RANDY J. PITCHER, Plaintiff, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

5:06-CV-1395 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stokes v. Astrue

The caselaw in this Circuit is clear as courts have consistently held that if the record does not contain any…

Reid v. Astrue

"`Where the claimant's symptoms as described by medical evidence appear to match those described in the…