From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitcher v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 3, 2008
3:05-CV-0672 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2008)

Opinion

3:05-CV-0672 (LEK/GHL).

March 3, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 13, 2008, by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 9). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Kevin Pitcher, which were filed on February 28, 2008. Objections (Dkt. No. 10).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits be AFFIRMED, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pitcher v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 3, 2008
3:05-CV-0672 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Pitcher v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN L. PITCHER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

3:05-CV-0672 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Pamela M. H. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

. This Court has previously accepted similar testimony, where “the vocational expert relied [solely] upon…

Cochran v. Colvin

Moreover, the Court finds that the ALJ properly weighed the various medical opinions in her analysis.See 20…