From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pistorius v. Yost

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-187J (W.D. Pa. Jul. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-187J.

July 24, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for a Report and Recommendation in accordance with the Magistrate Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on July 7, 2006, docket no. 19, recommending that the petition be denied as moot.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

After de novo review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Pistorius v. Yost

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-187J (W.D. Pa. Jul. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Pistorius v. Yost

Case Details

Full title:RONALD PISTORIUS, Petitioner, v. JOHN YOST, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 24, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-187J (W.D. Pa. Jul. 24, 2006)