From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pistchal v. Durant

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1915
110 N.E. 1043 (N.Y. 1915)

Summary

In Pistchal v. Durant (216 N.Y. 644), cited in support of respondents' contention, the court held as to a garnishee order based upon a judgment previously rendered in an action, that the order appealed from was not a final order in the action and hence not appealable without permission.

Summary of this case from Matter of Irving Trust Co.

Opinion

Submitted September 28, 1915

Decided October 12, 1915

Max Perlman for appellant.

Warren McConihe for respondents.


Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Pistchal v. Durant

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1915
110 N.E. 1043 (N.Y. 1915)

In Pistchal v. Durant (216 N.Y. 644), cited in support of respondents' contention, the court held as to a garnishee order based upon a judgment previously rendered in an action, that the order appealed from was not a final order in the action and hence not appealable without permission.

Summary of this case from Matter of Irving Trust Co.
Case details for

Pistchal v. Durant

Case Details

Full title:HENRY PISTCHAL, Appellant, v . JANET L. DURANT, Respondent; BASIL N…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 12, 1915

Citations

110 N.E. 1043 (N.Y. 1915)
216 N.Y. 644

Citing Cases

Matter of Irving Trust Co.

He moved for the order by notice of motion at Special Term under the authority of section 47, subdivision a…