From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piskanin v. U.S. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-1487 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-1487

07-02-2013

MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Respondents


(Judge Conner)


MEMORANDUM

On June 7, 2013, a Memorandum and Order issued dismissing the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice. (Doc. 3). At that time, the Court inadvertently failed to address the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability. Therefore, following the filing of a Notice of Appeal, the matter was remanded to the undersigned to make a determination as to whether a certificate of appealability should issue. (Doc. 6).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability ("COA"), an appeal may not be taken from a final order in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A COA may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). "A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003)).

The petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and petitioner's right to further pursue his challenges to detainers lodged by the states of New Jersey and New York in the appropriate forum has not been foreclosed. Jurists of reason would not find the disposition of this case debatable. Accordingly, it is determined that there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability as petitioner has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right."" 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).

An appropriate order follows.

______________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, Petitioner,

v.
UNITED STATES SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
et al., Respondents

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-1487


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

______________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Piskanin v. U.S. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-1487 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Piskanin v. U.S. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-1487 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2013)