Summary
In Pirrotta, this court stated: "In our opinion, where a party may be held in contempt and committed and where the affidavits relating to his financial position are contradictory, a full and formal evidentiary hearing should be held and a record made thereof so as to permit a review of any determination made (cf. Domestic Relations Law, §§ 245, 246; Espejo v. Espejo, 41 A.D.2d 555)."
Summary of this case from Corso v. CorsoOpinion
July 2, 1973
In an action in which a judgment was entered on December 14, 1971, granting plaintiff a separation, alimony and child support, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 1, 1973, which, after a hearing, (1) granted plaintiff's motion to adjudge defendant in contempt of court for failing to comply with said award of alimony and child support and (2) denied his motion to reduce the alimony and child support provisions of the judgment and to cancel the arrears. Order reversed, without costs, and motion and cross motion remitted to Special Term for a formal evidentiary hearing to determine the issues of alimony payments and contempt. No minutes were taken at the hearing on the motion and defendant claims he was not allowed to testify or cross-examine plaintiff. In our opinion, where a party may be held in contempt and committed and where the affidavits relating to his financial position are contradictory, a full and formal evidentiary hearing should be held and a record made thereof so as to permit a review of any determination made (cf. Domestic Relations Law, §§ 245, 246; Espejo v. Espejo, 41 A.D.2d 555). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.