Opinion
Docket No. 96-9689, No. 1773.
Argued: July 16, 1997.
Decided: July 30, 1997.
Raymond E. Kerno, Lysaght, Lysaght Kramer, P.C., Lake Success, New York (Joseph P. Baumgartner, of counsel), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Janet L. Zaleon, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, New York (Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel, Barry P. Schwartz, Robin Binder, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shira A. Scheindlin, Judge) granting appellees' motion for summary judgment and denying appellants' cross-motion for summary judgment on appellants' civil rights complaint. We affirm.
Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.
John Pirozzi and Frank Rotundi appeal from Judge Scheindlin's adverse grant of summary judgment in their action brought under 18 U.S.C. §(s) 1983. The appellants, New York City Police Officers, allege that the release of their testimony before the New York City Police Department Civilian Complaint Review Board to the Kings County District Attorney violated both their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination and their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pirozzi v. City of New York, 950 F. Supp. 90 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).