Summary
affirming a Court of Appeals opinion without precedential value by an equally divided vote
Summary of this case from State v. DewOpinion
No. 93A16
12-21-2016
Michael C. Piro v. Rebecca Hadden McKeever, L.C.S.W.; Cynthia L. Sapp, Ph.D.; Karen Barry, M.F.T., LMFT; and Davidson Counseling Associates
Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP, Raleigh, by Tobias S. Hampson and Michelle D. Connell, for plaintiff-appellant. Epstein Law Firm, PLLC, by Andrew J. Epstein, for defendant-appellee Rebecca Hadden McKeever, L.C.S.W. McGuireWoods LLP, by Mark E. Anderson and Monica E. Webb, Raleigh, for National Association of Social Workers, amicus curiae.
Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP, Raleigh, by Tobias S. Hampson and Michelle D. Connell, for plaintiff-appellant.
Epstein Law Firm, PLLC, by Andrew J. Epstein, for defendant-appellee Rebecca Hadden McKeever, L.C.S.W.
McGuireWoods LLP, by Mark E. Anderson and Monica E. Webb, Raleigh, for National Association of Social Workers, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
In this case we consider whether plaintiff's complaint sufficiently alleged claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because the members of the Court are equally divided as to both issues, the holding of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g. , State v. Long , 365 N.C. 5, 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene , 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.