From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation v. Stumpf

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Oct 4, 2011
CV 11 2369 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

          Gilbert R. Serota (No. 75305), Sarah A. Good (No. 148742), Marc Price Wolf (No. 254495), Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady, Falk & Rabkin, A Professional Corporation, Attorneys for Defendants, John G. Stumpf, Howard I. Atkins, John D. Baker II, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean, Susan E. Engel, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Donald M. James, Richard D. McCormick, Mackey J. McDonald, Cynthia H. Milligan, Nicholas G. Moore, Philip J. Quigley, Judith M. Runstad, Stephen W. Sanger and Susan G. Swenson.

          Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Shawn A. Williams

          Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Travis E. Downs III, Benny C. Goodman III, Eric I. Niehausm

          Barrett Johnston, LLC, George E. Barrett, Douglas S. Johnston, Jr., Timothy L. Miles, Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING FOR INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

          SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

         Defendants John G. Stumpf, Howard I. Atkins, John D. Baker II, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean, Susan E. Engel, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Donald M. James, Richard D. McCormick, Mackey J. McDonald, Cynthia H. Milligan, Nicholas G. Moore, Philip J. Quigley, Judith M. Runstad, Stephen W. Sanger and Susan G. Swenson (collectively, "Individual Defendants"), and plaintiffs Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust and City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System (collectively, "Plaintiffs") hereby stipulate to the following:

         WHEREAS, on September 27, 2011, the parties submitted to the Court a stipulation and proposed order setting a briefing and hearing schedule for Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss and continuing the case management conference to the same time as the hearing;

         WHEREAS, on September 28, 2011, the Court granted the stipulation and proposed order and scheduled the hearing on the motion to dismiss for 9:00 a.m. and the case management conference for 2:30 p.m. on December 9, 2011;

         WHEREAS, counsel for the undersigned parties have other preexisting court hearings scheduled at or near the same time as the hearing scheduled for December 9, 2011 and have agreed to continue the date for the hearing and the case management conference;

         NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows subject to the approval of the Court:

         1. Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss currently scheduled for hearing on December 9, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. shall be continued to January 27, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. or at such other time as the Court shall order; and

         2. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for December 9, 2011, at 2:30 p.m., shall be continued to January 27, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         I, Sarah Good, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing For Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Continuing Case Management Conference. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Shawn Williams has concurred in this filing.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation v. Stumpf

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Oct 4, 2011
CV 11 2369 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation v. Stumpf

Case Details

Full title:PIRELLI ARMSTRONG TIRE CORPORATION, RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

CV 11 2369 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)