From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pirela v. Stewart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02525-ZLW (D. Colo. Aug. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02525-ZLW

08-23-2012

EDWIN MITCHELL PIRELA, Pro Se Pro Hoc Vice, ADA Litigant, Plaintiff v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TED STEWART, United States District Court, Central Utah, JUDGE PAUL G. MAUGHAN, The (SLK) Third District County Court, Salt Lake, Utah, ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Utah Attorney General's Office, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER D. BALLORD, Utah Attorney General's Office, SUPREME JUSTICE CHRISTINE M. DURHAM, APPEAL JUDGE PAMELA T. GREENWOOD, UTAH APPEAL COURT, and UTAH SUPREME COURT, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

On August 22, 2012, Plaintiff submitted to the Court a "Motion for Court to Answer Question of Law," ECF No. 38. The Motion is inappropriate. Pursuant to the Court's Minute Order entered on June 1, 2010, the Motion is ordered stricken.


Summaries of

Pirela v. Stewart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02525-ZLW (D. Colo. Aug. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Pirela v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN MITCHELL PIRELA, Pro Se Pro Hoc Vice, ADA Litigant, Plaintiff v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02525-ZLW (D. Colo. Aug. 23, 2012)