From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piper v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Jan 26, 2016
Case No.: 2:15-cv-154 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:15-cv-154

01-26-2016

BRANDON PIPER, Petitioner, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

Before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. In his Petition, the pro se Petitioner claimed that the Bureau of Prisons failed to properly credit him for the 823 days he served on home confinement on pretrial release while awaiting trial.

On June 15, 2015, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition. ECF No. 4. Petitioner filed a response on July 1, 2015. ECF No. 6. This case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Local Civil Rule 72 for a report and recommendation. In the Report and Recommendation filed on October 30, 2015, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Petition be dismissed. ECF No. 8. By receiving a copy of the Report and Recommendation, the parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations. On November 30, 2015, the Court received Petitioner's objections, after the deadline for filing objections expired. ECF No. 9. On December 3, 2015, the Court received the Respondent's response to Petitioner's objections. ECF No. 10.

The Court, having reviewed the record and examined the untimely objections filed by Petitioner to the Report and Recommendation and Respondent's response, and having made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation on the grounds staled by the Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS and APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on October 30, 2015, ECF No. 8, in its entirety as the Court's own opinion. It is ORDERED that the Petition, ECF No. 1, is DENIED and DISMISSED and FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of Respondent.

Petitioner may appeal from the Judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court at the Walter E. Hoffman United Stales Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within sixty days from the date of entry of judgment. Because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003). The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to Petitioner and counsel of record for Respondent.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________

Arenda Wright Allen

United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia
Date: January 26, 2016


Summaries of

Piper v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Jan 26, 2016
Case No.: 2:15-cv-154 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Piper v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON PIPER, Petitioner, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

Case No.: 2:15-cv-154 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016)

Citing Cases

Piper v. Wilson

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma…