From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pioneer Commercial v. Am. Fin. Mortg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
Dec 2, 2003
840 A.2d 989 (Pa. 2003)

Opinion

December 2, 2003.

No. 279 EAL 2002, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the order of the Superior Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Whether an action for conversion can be used to circumvent Section 4A502 of the UCC, 13 Pa.C.S.A. § 4A205; and, if so, whether Core States satisfied the common-law elements for a valid setoff.

2. Whether Pioneer should have acted pursuant to the adverse claim statute, as set forth in Section 606 of the Banking Code.

3. Whether consequential damages are available for a wrongful setoff.

4. Whether punitive damages were available in this case.

5. Whether Pioneer lack a valid security interest in the funds.

The Application by Petitioner for Leave to Permit Prothonotary to Distribute Clarifying Letter to the Court filed on December 30, 2002 is GRANTED. Also, the Application by Petitioner for Leave to Permit Prothonotary to Distribute Clarifying Letter to the Court filed on August 9, 2002 and the Application for Leave to Permit Prothonotary to Distribute the Attached Opinion to the Court are DENIED.

Justice WILLIAM H. LAMB did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Pioneer Commercial v. Am. Fin. Mortg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
Dec 2, 2003
840 A.2d 989 (Pa. 2003)
Case details for

Pioneer Commercial v. Am. Fin. Mortg

Case Details

Full title:PIONEER COMMERCIAL FUNDING CORP. AND BANK ONE, TEXAS, N.A. v. AMERICAN…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 2, 2003

Citations

840 A.2d 989 (Pa. 2003)
840 A.2d 989