From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pioneer Centres Holding v. Alerus Fin.

Supreme Court of the United States
Sep 20, 2018
139 S. Ct. 50 (2018)

Summary

stating that expert opinion as to legal standards and conclusions "does 'not aid the jury in making a decision, but rather attempts to substitute [the expert's] judgment for the jury's.'" (quoting Baumann v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 836 F. Supp. 2d 1196, 1202 (D. Colo. 2011) (alterations in original))

Summary of this case from Craig v. Xlear, Inc.

Opinion

No. 17–667 (R46–036 / OT 2017).

09-20-2018

PIONEER CENTRES HOLDING, et al. v. ALERUS FINANCIAL.


The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.


Summaries of

Pioneer Centres Holding v. Alerus Fin.

Supreme Court of the United States
Sep 20, 2018
139 S. Ct. 50 (2018)

stating that expert opinion as to legal standards and conclusions "does 'not aid the jury in making a decision, but rather attempts to substitute [the expert's] judgment for the jury's.'" (quoting Baumann v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 836 F. Supp. 2d 1196, 1202 (D. Colo. 2011) (alterations in original))

Summary of this case from Craig v. Xlear, Inc.
Case details for

Pioneer Centres Holding v. Alerus Fin.

Case Details

Full title:PIONEER CENTRES HOLDING, et al. v. ALERUS FINANCIAL.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Sep 20, 2018

Citations

139 S. Ct. 50 (2018)
201 L. Ed. 2d 1128

Citing Cases

Mosaic Potash Carlsbad, Inc. v. Intrepid Potash, Inc.

Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Tr. v. Alerus Fin., N.A., 858 F.3d 1324, 1341-43…

Craig v. Xlear, Inc.

" Id. Accordingly, the Tenth Circuit held that "when the purpose of testimony is to direct the jury's…