Opinion
June, 1906.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P.J., Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Jenks, JJ., dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Pinto v. Interurban Street Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1906
113 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Summaries of
Pinto v. Interurban Street Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1906
113 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for
Pinto v. Interurban Street Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:Simy B. Pinto, Respondent, v. Interurban Street Railway Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1906
Citations
113 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)