Opinion
2:21-cv-00652-CDS-EJY
08-31-2022
JAMES PINTAR and TRICIA PINTAR, Plaintiff, v. AAA NEVADA FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY a foreign Corporation; AAA Insurance; a foreign Corporation, DOES I-X, inclusive, ROE CORPORATIONS 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
DAVID M. ZANIEL, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants KIRK KENNEDY, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs
DAVID M. ZANIEL, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants
KIRK KENNEDY, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS* OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EC F 35 (FIRST REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Plaintiffs JAMES PINTAR and TRICIA PINTAR (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), by and through their attorney of record, KIRK T. KENNEDY, ESQ., Defendant AAA NEVADA FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through their attorney of record David Zaniel, Esq., of RANALLI, ZANIEL, FOWLER & MORAN counsel, DAVID M. ZANIEL, ESQ., stipulate that the Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment is due September 9, 2022, and due to scheduling concerns and time needed to research and prepare, the Defendant has requested additional time to file their response, and the parties therefore agree to extend the time for the filing of the Defendant's Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF 35, for a period of 21 additional days to September 30, 2022.
This is the first request by the Defendant to extend time for the filing of the Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF 35.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED