Opinion
2:22-cv-00677-APG-BNW
10-07-2022
ROBERTO PINTADO, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.
ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION, (2) DENYING OBJECTION, (3) DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (4) DISMISSING CASE [ECF Nos. 33, 34, 35]
Magistrate Judge Weksler recommends that plaintiff Roberto Pintado's amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. ECF No. 33. Pintado filed an objection to that recommendation and a motion for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 34, 35.
I have conducted a de novo review of the amended complaint and Judge Weksler's Report and Recommendation, as required under Local Rule IB 3-2. Judge Weksler's Report sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the decision. I agree with and adopt her recommendation. I dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice because Mr. Pintado has made several attempts but still cannot state a claim for relief. Further amendment would be futile. Because I am dismissing his complaint, I also deny Pintado's motion for summary judgment.
I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 33) is accepted, the plaintiff's objection and motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 34, 35) are denied, and this case is dismissed.